KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE, (1962)

No. 615

Argued:     Decided: February 19, 1962

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 174 A. 2d 560.

Aram K. Berberian for appellant.

J. Joseph Nugent, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.


RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/368/516.html">368 U.S. 516 </a> (1962) 368 U.S. 516 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

368 U.S. 516

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, SHERIFF.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
No. 835, Misc.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 77 Nev. 399, 365 P.2d 489.

Samuel S. Lionel for appellant.

John F. Mendoza and Charles L. Garner for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [368 U.S. 516, 517]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More