CRUZ v. COLORADO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

STANDARD DRUG CO., INC. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., (1961)

No. 127

Argued:     Decided: October 9, 1961

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 202 Va. 367, 117 S. E. 2d 289.

LeRoy R. Cohen, Jr. and Robert A. Cox, Jr. for appellant.

Walter E. Rogers for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


CRUZ v. COLORADO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/368/4.html">368 U.S. 4 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 4 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CRUZ v. COLORADO, 368 U.S. 4 (1961)

368 U.S. 4

CRUZ v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 66, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error of the Attorney General of Colorado, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded. [368 U.S. 4, 5]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More