SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, (1961)

No. 246

Argued:     Decided: October 9, 1961

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 252 Iowa 948, 108 N. W. 2d 253.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

C. W. Garberson and William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [368 U.S. 3, 4]  


SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/368/3.html">368 U.S. 3 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 3 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., 368 U.S. 3 (1961)

368 U.S. 3

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 122.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 55 Cal. 2d 407, 359 P.2d 625.

Pierce Works, Warren M. Christopher, Hugo A. Steinmeyer, Richard E. Sherwood and Brenton L. Metzler for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More