CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SNYDER v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN, (1961)

No. 580

Argued:     Decided: February 20, 1961

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 147 Conn. 374, 161 A. 2d 770.

Philip Reich for appellants.

James J. O'Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/365/299.html">365 U.S. 299 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 299 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP., 365 U.S. 299 (1961)

365 U.S. 299

CORDAK, DOING BUSINESS AS A. B. DENTAL PLATE LABORATORY, ET AL. v. REUBEN
H. DONNELLEY CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 582.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 20 Ill. 2d 153, 169 N. E. 2d 321.

John Paul Stevens for appellants.

Owen Rall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [365 U.S. 299, 300]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More