NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, (1961)

No. 556

Argued:     Decided: February 20, 1961

192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.

E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/365/298.html">365 U.S. 298 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 298 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961)

365 U.S. 298

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 197, 168 N. E. 2d 649.

Lyman Stansky for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [365 U.S. 298, 299]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More