OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, (1961)

No. 503

Argued:     Decided: January 9, 1961

183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.

Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/627.html">364 U.S. 627 </a> (1961) 364 U.S. 627 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

364 U.S. 627

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.

Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 627, 628]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More