PICCOTT v. FLORIDA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE, (1960)

No. 303

Argued:     Decided: October 17, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 142 Colo. 249, 350 P.2d 825.

Fred M. Winner for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Patterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/293.html">364 U.S. 293 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 293 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, 364 U.S. 293 (1960)

364 U.S. 293

PICCOTT v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 112, Misc.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 116 So.2d 626.

Tobias Simon for petitioner.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [364 U.S. 293, 294]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More