STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, (1960)

No. 163

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1960

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Wattawa for appellant.

C. Robert Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/289.html">364 U.S. 289 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 289 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, 364 U.S. 289 (1960)

364 U.S. 289

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for clarification.

Reported below: 87 Ariz. 268, 350 P.2d 674.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

Denison Kitchel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for clarification. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U.S. 551 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. [364 U.S. 289, 290]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More