WEST v. CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WEST v. CALIFORNIA, (1960)

No. 117

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Henry T. Moore, Sr. and Henry T. Moore, Jr. for appellant.

William B. McKesson and Ralph F. Bagley for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


KAHAN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/287.html">364 U.S. 287 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 287 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KAHAN v. CALIFORNIA, 364 U.S. 287 (1960)

364 U.S. 287

KAHAN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 130.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

A. J. Blackman for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 287, 288]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More