CAMARA v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CAMARA v. UNITED STATES, (1960)

No. 605

Argued:     Decided: June 27, 1960

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 271 F.2d 787.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.


CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/283.html">364 U.S. 283 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 283 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

364 U.S. 283

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA (OR NATIONAL BANK OF ALASKA) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 925, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and motions for other relief denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. The motions for other relief are denied. [364 U.S. 283, 284]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More