GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN, (1960)

No. 620

Argued:     Decided: May 31, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 146 Conn. 531, 153 A. 2d 415.

Raymond T. Benedict, Morgan P. Ames, Francis J. McNamara, Jr. and John F. Spindler for appellant.

Ira E. Hicks, Norwick R. G. Goodspeed, John C. Sturges and Samuel A. Gilliland for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/363/143.html">363 U.S. 143 </a> (1960) 363 U.S. 143 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, 363 U.S. 143 (1960)

363 U.S. 143

GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 799, Misc.
Decided May 31, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 29 N. J. 506, 150 A. 2d 291.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [363 U.S. 143, 144]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More