CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH, (1960)

No. 654

Argued:     Decided: April 25, 1960

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Louis C. Glasso for appellant.

Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr. and David Stahl for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.


CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/362/457.html">362 U.S. 457 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 457 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

362 U.S. 457

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 740.
Decided April 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 45, 162 N. E. 2d 125.

John Lansdale for appellant.

Paul H. Torbet and John F. Ray, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [362 U.S. 457, 458]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More