SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, (1960)

No. 628

Argued:     Decided: March 21, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 327 S. W. 2d 954.

Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant.

Jerome M. Alper for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/362/215.html">362 U.S. 215 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

362 U.S. 215

SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540.

Robert T. Mautz for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [362 U.S. 215, 216]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More