NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, (1960)

No. 563

Argued:     Decided: February 23, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.

Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/361/534.html">361 U.S. 534 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

361 U.S. 534

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.

Herbert M. Brune for appellant.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 534, 535]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More