ORTEGA v. BIBB

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, (1959)

No. 830

Argued:     Decided: June 15, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24.

Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORTEGA v. BIBB, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/360/314.html">360 U.S. 314 </a> (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

360 U.S. 314

ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. [360 U.S. 314, 315]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More