CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RR. v. ILLINOIS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LAMAR BATH HOUSE CO. v. CITY OF HOT SPRINGS, (1959)

No. 791

Argued:     Decided: May 25, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 229 Ark. 214, 315 S. W. 2d 884.

William M. Clark and Richard C. Butler for appellants.

James W. Chesnutt for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RR. v. ILLINOIS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/359/534.html">359 U.S. 534 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 534 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RR. v. ILLINOIS, 359 U.S. 534 (1959)

359 U.S. 534

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 793.
Decided May 25, 1959.

168 F. Supp. 706, affirmed.

Edwin R. Eckersall and R. K. Merrill for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Harry R. Begley, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Illinois and the Illinois Commerce Commission, and S. Ashley Guthrie and Francis D. Fisher for the Milwaukee Road Commuters' Association, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [359 U.S. 534, 535]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More