SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, (1959)

No. 763

Argued:     Decided: May 25, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 84 Ariz. 365, 329 P.2d 883.

George L. Buland, Burton Mason and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Wm. S. Andrews, Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley W. Trachta for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


RODGERS v. UTAH, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/359/532.html">359 U.S. 532 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 532 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RODGERS v. UTAH, 359 U.S. 532 (1959)

359 U.S. 532

RODGERS v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 695, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 Utah 2d 156, 329 P.2d 1075.

Lewis J. Wallace for appellant.

E. R. Callister, Attorney General of Utah, and Raymond W. Gee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [359 U.S. 532, 533]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More