BRISTOL v. HEATON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FOSDICK v. LINZELL, (1959)

No. 704

Argued:     Decided: April 6, 1959

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert Fosdick, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BRISTOL v. HEATON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/359/230.html">359 U.S. 230 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 230 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRISTOL v. HEATON, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)

359 U.S. 230

BRISTOL ET AL. v. HEATON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 581, Misc.
Decided April 6, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 317 S. W. 2d 86.

Appellants pro se.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, and Leonard Passmore and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied. [359 U.S. 230, 231]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More