GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA, (1958)

No. 166

Argued:     Decided: October 13, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 184 Pa. Super. 522, 136 A. 2d 145.

John W. Keller and Mitchell Salem Fisher for appellant.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Frank P. Lawley, Jr. and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, and George C. Eppinger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/358/47.html">358 U.S. 47 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 47 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 358 U.S. 47 (1958)

358 U.S. 47

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 323, 148 N. E. 2d 229.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [358 U.S. 47, 48]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More