F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, (1959)

No. 526

Argued:     Decided: January 12, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 423, 151 N. E. 2d 845.

Russell D. Morrill and Francis L. Casey for appellant.

Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/358/282.html">358 U.S. 282 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 282 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)

358 U.S. 282

McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 283, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 492, 321 P.2d 497.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [358 U.S. 282, 283]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More