CHAUFFEURS v. NEWELL

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

POGOR v. NEW YORK, (1958)

No. 874

Argued:     Decided: April 28, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 3 N. Y. 2d 836, 941, 144 N. E. 2d 722, 145 N. E. 2d 387.

Bernard Tompkins for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan and Richard G. Denzer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


CHAUFFEURS v. NEWELL, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/356/341.html">356 U.S. 341 </a> (1958) 356 U.S. 341 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CHAUFFEURS v. NEWELL, 356 U.S. 341 (1958)

356 U.S. 341

CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS LOCAL UNION 795 ET AL. v. NEWELL, DOING
BUSINESS AS EL DORADO DAIRY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 847.
Decided April 28, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

181 Kan. 898, 182 Kan. 205, 317 P.2d 817, 319 P.2d 171, reversed.

Payne H. Ratner for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas is reversed. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 98 , Third. [356 U.S. 341, 342]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More