HOWARD v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HOWARD v. UNITED STATES, (1958)

No. 186

Argued:     Decided: March 10, 1958

On representations of the Solicitor General and examination of the record, certiorari granted, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated, and case remanded to District Court with directions to afford petitioner a hearing on his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 131, 247 F.2d 537.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Upon the representations made in the Solicitor General's memorandum, and an examination of the record, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to afford petitioner a hearing on his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. [356 U.S. 25, 26]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More