THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

THILLENS, INC., v. MOREY, (1958)

No. 696

Argued:     Decided: March 3, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 579, 144 N. E. 2d 735.

Henry F. Tenney, David Jacker and Perry S. Patterson for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Ben Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Auditor of Public Accounts of Illinois et al., and Charles H. Thompson and Hirsch E. Soble for Arnold et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ROWLAND v. TEXAS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/355/606.html">355 U.S. 606 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 606 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROWLAND v. TEXAS, 355 U.S. 606 (1958)

355 U.S. 606

ROWLAND v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 709.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 165 Tex. Cr. R. ___, 311 S. W. 2d 831.

Dorsey B. Hardeman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [355 U.S. 606, 607]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More