KLIG v. ROGERS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MILLS MILL v. HAWKINS, (1958)

No. 670

Argued:     Decided: March 3, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ S. C. ___.

L. W. Perrin, Jr., Edward P. Perrin and J. Davis Kerr for appellants.

Harvey W. Johnson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


KLIG v. ROGERS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/355/605.html">355 U.S. 605 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 605 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KLIG v. ROGERS, 355 U.S. 605 (1958)

355 U.S. 605

KLIG v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 143.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss.

Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 294, 244 F.2d 742.

Jack Wasserman and David Carliner for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon suggestion of mootness by all of the parties, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot. [355 U.S. 605, 606]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More