TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, (1958)

No. 574

Argued:     Decided: March 3, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.

Francis G. Coates for appellants.

Dow H. Heard for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/355/603.html">355 U.S. 603 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 603 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

355 U.S. 603

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.

Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.

Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 603, 604]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More