WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, (1957)

No. 438

Argued:     Decided: November 12, 1957

Judgment affirmed.

Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/355/40.html">355 U.S. 40 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 40 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)

355 U.S. 40

SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
Decided November 12, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A. 2d 240.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 40, 41]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More