COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, (1957)

No. 128

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1957

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 1 N. Y. 2d 413, 135 N. E. 2d 801.

Max Freund for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/355/12.html">355 U.S. 12 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 12 (1957) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, 355 U.S. 12 (1957)

355 U.S. 12

COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY (FORMERLY C. B. COTTRELL & SONS CO.) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE.
No. 316.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 128 A. 2d 225.

Edward J. Ennis for appellant.

Henry M. Canby for the Pawcatuck Company et al. and David F. Anderson for the Harris-Seybold Company et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [355 U.S. 12, 13]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More