ROSS v. FORT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ROSS v. FORT, (1933)

No. 613

Argued:     Decided: December 18, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12 , 40 S. Ct. 417; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19 , 22-24, 51 S. Ct. 15, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298 , 299 S., 18 S. Ct. 594; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535 , 536 S., 32 S. Ct. 105; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550 , 32 S. Ct. 784.[ Ross v. Fort 290 U.S. 603 (1933) ]

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More