TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO v. PENNSYLVANIA R CO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA R CO, (1927)

No. 168

Argued:     Decided: February 28, 1927

Messrs. Luther Day and Rufus S. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Donald W. Kling, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Andrew Squire, Thomas M. Kirby and Andrew P. Martin, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this Court on the authority of Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Almeida, 265 U.S. 104, 105 , 44 S. Ct. 449, and Oliver American Trading Co. v. United States of Mexico, 264 U.S. 440, 442 , 44 S. Ct. 390.

Footnotes

[ Footnote * ] Dismissal set aside 274 U.S. 181 , 47 S. Ct. 550, 71 L. Ed. -.[ Timken Roller Bearing Co v. Pennsylvania R Co 273 U.S. 665 (1927) ]

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More