SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT, (1918)

No. 61

Argued:     Decided: December 23, 1918

Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181 , 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243 , 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720 , 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147 , 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100 , 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232 , 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79 , 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216 , 35 Sup. Ct. 285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599 , 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304 , 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257 , 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More