PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., (1916)

No. 152

Argued:     Decided: January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674 , 42 L. ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34 , 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669 , 670 S., 58 L. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161 , 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624 , 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45 , 59 L. ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 , 59 L. ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More