BALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. US

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, (1910)

No. 124

Argued:     Decided: March 14, 1910

Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. [216 U.S. 617, 618]   Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.

Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More