MOORE v. US EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR CO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MOORE v. U S EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR CO, (1910)

No. 115

Argued:     Decided: March 7, 1910

Messrs. Frederick P. Fish, Melville Church, and Albert G. Davis for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Charles H. Duell, Robert N. Kenyon, and Walter F. Rogers for defendant in error.

Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1 , 53 L. ed. 65, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 6; Rousseau v. Brown, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U.S. 284 , 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore, 212 U.S. 285 , 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561 , 53 L. ed. 652, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 688; Gaines v. Knecht, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; United States ex rel. Taylor v. Taft, 203 U.S. 461 , 51 L. ed. 269, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148; United States v. Lynch, 137 U.S. 280 , 34 L. ed. 700, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 114; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U.S. 210, 226 , 32 S. L. ed. 908, 914, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 503. The application for Certiorari is also denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More