MILLS v. JOHNSON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MILLS v. JOHNSON, (1909)

No. 36

Argued:     Decided: December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86 , 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112 , 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432 , 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446 , 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78 , 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405 , 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More