CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, (1909)

No. 75

Argued:     Decided: January 25, 1909

Messrs. Gardiner Greene, Frank T. Browne, and Charles E. Serles for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516 , 51 L. ed. 1163, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More