PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY, (1895)

No. 566

Argued:     Decided: November 11, 1895

[159 U.S. 415, 417]   Wm. Matthews and Wm. Craig, for plaintiff in error.

S. W. Holladay and E. Burke Holladay, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

The opinions of the supreme court of California in this case are reported 68 Cal. 439, 9 Pac. 655; 93 Cal. 241, 29 Pac. 54; 102 Cal. 661, 36 Pac. 927. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U.S. 65 , 10 Sup. Ct. 241; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U.S. 244 , 10 Sup. Ct. 747; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361 , 14 Sup. Ct. 131, and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U.S. 4 ; Hoadley's Adm'r v. San Francisco, 124 U.S. 639 , 8 Sup. Ct. 659.

Writ of error dismissed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More