GRICER BERNARD v. MEGAN BRENNAN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

GRICER BERNARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-1975

    Decided: March 16, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.Kirk J. Angel, ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Steven N. Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Gricer Bernard appeals the district court's order granting Megan J. Brennan's motion to dismiss Bernard's amended complaint alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ยงยง 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016). We have considered Bernard's arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bernard v. Brennan, No. 1:15-cv-00777-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More