REGINALD JAWANN SELLS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion By Chief Justice Wright
Reginald Jawann Sells appeals from the revocation of his community supervision. The trial court assessed punishment at nine years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court's judgment.
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENT
REGINALD JAWANN SELLS, Appellant
No. 05–11–00741–CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeAppeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.F04–27938–M).
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered on May 2, 2012.
CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE