Skip to main content

Supreme Court of California - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 1 of 1 Showing Result 1 - 9 of 9
Description Date Docket #

Lee v. Hanley

Supreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Legal Malpractice
In a case to determine whether an attorney's refusal to return a former client's money after the client terminated the representation was "a wrongful...
08/20/2015 S220775

Cassel v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Evidence, Legal Malpractice, Civil Procedure, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
In plaintiff's malpractice action against his attorneys, claiming that by bad advice, deception, and coercion, the attorneys, who has a conflict of...
01/13/2011 S178914

AGUILAR v. LERNER

Supreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Legal Malpractice
Once a client files a malpractice lawsuit against his or her former attorney, the client waives any rights under the mandatory fee arbitration act....
04/22/2004 S099667

ZAMOS v. STROUD

Supreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Injury & Tort Law, Legal Malpractice
An attorney may be held liable for malicious prosecution for continuing to prosecute a lawsuit discovered to lack probable cause.
04/19/2004 S118032

VINER v. SWEET

Supreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice
When alleged legal malpractice occurred in the performance of transactional work, the client must prove the causation element according to the "but...
06/23/2003 S101964

FERGUSON v. LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

Supreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice, Remedies
Plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action may not recover as compensatory damages the punitive damages they allegedly lost due to the negligence of...
06/09/2003 S104444

BECK v. WECHT

Supreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Legal Malpractice
Co-counsel do not owe one another a fiduciary duty to conduct joint representation in a manner that does not diminish or eliminate the fees each...
06/27/2002 S099665

MUSSER v. PROVENCHER

Supreme Court of California
Insurance Law, Legal Malpractice
Public policy does not require the adoption of a blanket rule barring concurrent counsel or co-counsel from suing one another for indemnification of...
06/27/2002 S099938

COSCIA v. MCKENNA & CUNEO

Supreme Court of California
Legal Malpractice
An individual convicted of a criminal offense must obtain reversal of his or her conviction, or other exoneration by post-conviction relief, in order...
07/02/2001 S089226

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Copied to clipboard