Supreme Court of California - Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 9 of 9
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Lee v. HanleySupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Legal MalpracticeIn a case to determine whether an attorney's refusal to return a former client's money after the client terminated the representation was "a wrongful... |
08/20/2015 | S220775 |
Cassel v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Evidence, Legal Malpractice, Civil Procedure, Dispute Resolution & ArbitrationIn plaintiff's malpractice action against his attorneys, claiming that by bad advice, deception, and coercion, the attorneys, who has a conflict of... |
01/13/2011 | S178914 |
AGUILAR v. LERNERSupreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Legal MalpracticeOnce a client files a malpractice lawsuit against his or her former attorney, the client waives any rights under the mandatory fee arbitration act.... |
04/22/2004 | S099667 |
ZAMOS v. STROUDSupreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Injury & Tort Law, Legal MalpracticeAn attorney may be held liable for malicious prosecution for continuing to prosecute a lawsuit discovered to lack probable cause. |
04/19/2004 | S118032 |
VINER v. SWEETSupreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal MalpracticeWhen alleged legal malpractice occurred in the performance of transactional work, the client must prove the causation element according to the "but... |
06/23/2003 | S101964 |
FERGUSON v. LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLPSupreme Court of California
Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice, RemediesPlaintiffs in a legal malpractice action may not recover as compensatory damages the punitive damages they allegedly lost due to the negligence of... |
06/09/2003 | S104444 |
BECK v. WECHTSupreme Court of California
Attorney's Fees, Legal MalpracticeCo-counsel do not owe one another a fiduciary duty to conduct joint representation in a manner that does not diminish or eliminate the fees each... |
06/27/2002 | S099665 |
MUSSER v. PROVENCHERSupreme Court of California
Insurance Law, Legal MalpracticePublic policy does not require the adoption of a blanket rule barring concurrent counsel or co-counsel from suing one another for indemnification of... |
06/27/2002 | S099938 |
COSCIA v. MCKENNA & CUNEOSupreme Court of California
Legal MalpracticeAn individual convicted of a criminal offense must obtain reversal of his or her conviction, or other exoneration by post-conviction relief, in order... |
07/02/2001 | S089226 |
Results 1 to 9 of 9