United States Federal Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 2015-1919

In an action seeking declaratory judgment against defendant, a non-practicing entity that is solely in the business of monetizing and licensing intellectual property rights, that plaintiff's patents do not infringe the patent-in-suit and that such patents are invalid, the district court's dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is reversed and remanded where the court has specific personal jurisdiction over defendant, because has established that personal jurisdiction over defendant is proper in California.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2017/02/14


  • DYK


  • United States Federal Circuit


FindLaw Career Center

      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More