United States Federal Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

Kyocera Solar, Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, 2016-1348

In a case concerning antidumping duty investigations involving solar modules that incorporate crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, the court affirmed the lower court ruling that the statutory text as defined by the Department of Commerce did not support plaintiff's proposed interpretation of the statute because plaintiff's position was unambiguously refuted by the plain meaning of the statute through the court's analysis under the first prong of Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2016/12/15

Judges

  • STOLL

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More