United States Federal Circuit
Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., 04-1493
In a patent infringement dispute, judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant is affirmed where the district court properly concluded that substantial evidence did not support the jury's verdict of nonobviousness.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/09/2005
- Published 06/09/2005
Judges
- RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- William G. Todd, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Scott J. Bornstein.
- For Appellees:
- Joseph R. Re, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Darrell L. Olson, Douglas G. Muehlhauser, and Christy G. Lea.