Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., 04-1493

In a patent infringement dispute, judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant is affirmed where the district court properly concluded that substantial evidence did not support the jury's verdict of nonobviousness.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/09/2005
  • Published 06/09/2005

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William G. Todd, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was Scott J. Bornstein.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph R. Re, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Darrell L. Olson, Douglas G. Muehlhauser, and Christy G. Lea.
Copied to clipboard