United States Ninth Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

US v. Geozos, 17-35018

Reversing a district court denial of a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence of a defendant because the court failed to specify whether the five prior convictions used in establishing the defendant as an armed career criminal qualified under the residual clause, the force clause, or both clauses of the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2017/08/29

Judges

  • GRABER

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More