Read Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 07-1624

Summary judgment for defendant in an action alleging high fees in violation of section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 is affirmed where the circuit court rejects the approach in Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc. 694 F.2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982) interpreting section 36(b) as merely delineating a fiduciary standard and not creating a "reasonableness" approach in relation to the fees imposed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/19/2008
• Published 05/19/2008

Judges

• EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and KANNE and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James C. Bradley, Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, Charleston, SC, Ernest Young (argued), Austin, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Gordon B. Nash, Jr., Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Chicago, IL, John D. Donovan, Jr. (argued), Brian R. Blais, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for Defendant-Appellee.