United States Fourth Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

Hill v. Coggins, 161457

Affirming district court rulings in favor of plaintiffs that they have standing to bring suit and that four grizzly bears whose living conditions were at issue were animals protected by the Endangered Species Act, but vacating and remanding their decision that the manner in which the defendant zoo keeps them is archaic but not poor enough to amount to an unlawful taking.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2017/08/14

Judges

  • FLOYD

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More