United States Third Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

Egan v. Delaware River Port Authority, 16-1471

In a suit claiming that the Port Authority discriminated against plaintiff in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. section 621 et seq. (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. section 12101 et seq. (ADA), and retaliated against him for exercising his right to take leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. section 2601 et seq. (FMLA), the district court's judgment entering the jury's finding that he was not the victim of discrimination or retaliation is: 1) vacated in part where the district court erred in requiring plaintiff to provide direct evidence of retaliation; and 2) affirmed in part where the district court within its discretion in excluding the testimony of plaintiff's coworker.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2017/03/21

Judges

  • SHWARTZ

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More