ARAMONY v. UNITED WAY OF AM., 00-7146
In a suit by former CEO claiming a right to certain disputed benefits under the employer's replacement benefit plan, the contract at issue did not provide the disputed replacement benefits lost due to the 1986 enactment of Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code.
- Decided 05/16/2003
- Published 05/16/2003
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:, Before WINTER, LEVAL, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.
United States Second Circuit
Dennis Houdek,Curan Callahan Gale & Houdek, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Paul J. Ondrasik, Jr. (Sara E. Hauptfuehrer, on the brief), Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.