United States First Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

US v. DiDonna, 16-1469

Affirming a conviction for extortion because the evidence was sufficient, but reversing a conviction for attempting to collect an extension of credit by extortionate means because the evidence was insufficient to find that the defendant made an extension of credit.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2017/08/02

Judges

  • SELYA

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More