United States First Circuit
Vineberg v. Bissonnette, 081136
In a property matter concerning the viability of a laches defense asserted by the current possessor of a work of art in effort to fend of an action for replevin, summary judgment in favor of original owner's successors in interest is affirmed where: 1) the district court acted well within the realm of its discretion in refusing the defendant's tardy request to reopen discovery; and 2) the court had an appropriate rationale for granting the plaintiffs' motion for brevis disposition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/19/2008
- Published 11/19/2008
Judges
Court
- United States First Circuit