Read Bennett v. Saint-Gobain Corp., 07-1219

In an employment discrimination action, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed over plaintiff's contentions that: 1) the district court improperly excluded certain evidence that he proffered at the summary judgment stage; 2) the court erred in determining that he failed to raise genuine issues of material fact sufficient to ward off brevis disposition; and 3) the court should not have disregarded a further evidentiary proffer made in connection with his motion for reconsideration of the summary judgment order.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/02/2007
• Published 11/02/2007

Judges

• SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

Court

• United States First Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael J. Michaeles, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Hope A. Comisky, with whom Amy G. McAndrew, Pepper Hamilton LLP, James B. Conroy, Jill Brenner Meixel, and Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP were on brief, for appellees.